Nitecore MT22C Multi-Task Tactical Flashlight Review

Next in my somewhat long list of Nitecore lights is a light very similar to the P26 I just reviewed.  This is a smaller variant, still with the rotary dial and dual switch.

Official Specs and Features


There’s just one version of the MT22C.


The MSRP on this light is a reasonable $49.95.  You can buy this one at

Short Review

This is another solid iteration in the MT series, with the infinite adjustment.  Just like on the P26, the UI – the rotary dial – really needs to have a detent to differentiate Turbo from the rest of the regular modes.

Long Review

The Big Table

Nitecore MT22C
Emitter: Cree XP-L HD (V6)
Price in USD at publication time: $49.95
Cell: 1×18650
Turbo Runtime High Runtime
Switch Type: Dual
On-Board Charging? No
Claimed Lumens (lm) 1000
Claimed Throw (m) 185
Candela (Calculated) in cd (at 30s) 403lux @ 5.078m = 10392cd
Throw (Calculated) (m) 203.9 (110.2% of claim)*
All my Nitecore reviews!
  • Standard measurement disclaimer: I am an amateur flashlight reviewer. I don’t have $10,000 or even $1,000 worth of testing equipment. I test output and such in PVC tubes!! Please consider claims within 10% of what I measure to be perfectly reasonable (accurate, even).

What’s Included


  • Nitecore MT22C
  • Lanyard
  • Pocket clip
  • Nylon pouch
  • Spare boot
  • Spare o-ring (2)
  • Manual and paperwork

Package and Manual

Standard Nitecore package!

Standard Nitecore manual!  Here’s a pdf!

Build Quality and Disassembly

Much like most of Nitecore’s lights, this one has good build quality.  The anodizing seems nice and thick, and is somewhat glossy.
There’s a lot going on on the tube light.  There are two sections of diamond knurling.  There are some cooling fins around the head.  There’s the tactical ring (even though technically this light isn’t described as a tactical light).  There’s the hex area around the head.

The tail threads are triangle anodized threads.  Oddly the head threads are square cut (and also anodized).  Because of this I’d recommend changing the cell by removing the head (though, I never had any concern with cross threading either end).  This of course means the cell tube isn’t reversible (anyway OD on these parts is different.)

The tailcap is held together simply, by a retaining ring with divots. The head is held together differently – the driver is possibly press fit in but it’s hard to say.  To be honest, however it’s held together, I was distracted by the face that Nitecore has clearly designed into this part:
20180416-IMG_2419 copy.jpg
Here’s a closeup of the light, and the tactical ring.  More on the tac ring later.  The knurling is comfortable, and not too grabby.  Not even all that grippy to be sure.



Officially the light is 136mm long, and 25.4mm in diameter.  It weighs 92g.

It’s pretty long for a light that doesn’t add any features like on-board charging.  Presumably the rotary dial adds a good bit of length.


The included nylon pouch is standard flashlight fare.  There’s a plastic d-ring, and a double belt loop, including one with velcro.  The light will really fit either way except with the tactical ring installed.  If installed, the light will fit just one way, and not even fully into the pouch at that.

The tactical ring has a loop for lanyard attachment.
There’s also a lop in both sides of the tailcap, which is made for accepting the lanyard.  The light will tailstand but not all that gracefully since the tailcap has such large cutouts for glove operation.
The pocket clip has grooves on both ends of the light, but in both cases part of the light will stick up an inch or more.  The tactical ring makes the clip positioning specific.  But the clip and the ring may be used concurrently.

The tactical ring is threaded onto the light.  It doesn’t rotate freely.   So it’s removable, but if removed there will be left (and exposed) fairly fine threading for it.


The MT22C is intended for use with a single 18650.  It’ll also work with two CR123 cells, and even with RCR123 cells.  Since it works with RCR123 cells (x2), it should have no problem with 18350×2 as well.  (And it works just fine with 18350×2 – tested with the Vapcell 18350’s from LiIonWholesale.)  I don’t believe output is any better with two-up cells, though.

Both button top and flat top cells work

Here’s a runtime on the highest output, with the 18650 pictured above.  There appears to be no regulation, and a slow but steady decline from Turbo begins immediately.  That’s disappointing. In the test I failed to connect the thermo sensor appropriately , so the first 10 minutes or so (the important bit, of course) is missing.  Apologies for that.

The light does not have low voltage protection.  As tested with my bench power, the light never really shuts off, but the cell voltage gets below the forward voltage of the emitter.  This point seemed to be around 2.3-2.4V.

User Interface and Operation

There are two switches on the MT22C.  The primary one is a mechanical forward tail clicky.


The second is an unusual rotary dial on the head of the light.  And even though it looks like there’s a button in the center of the rotary, there isn’t.


Here’s a UI table!

State Action Result
Off Click On (Mode set by dial)
On Click Off
 On Fully clockwise Ultralow
 On Fully counterclockwise Strobe

While the rotary dial is neat, and works well, it could be better.  My primary qualm is that the only dial feedback is a single click between Turbo (or 100%) and Strobe.  One of my two issues is that this is not an exact position.  Sometimes strobe will engage before the actual click.  That’s one complaint.  The second complaint is tied to this – It’s hard (if not impossible) to reliably dial directly to 100% and move on to operation.  At the very least the dial needs two clicks.  One which is reliably turbo, and one (much stiffer imo) for strobe.  Or maybe that little button-lookingest-not-a-button in the center of the dial could be harnessed for strobe.
If you’re wondering that the above sounds familiar; it should.  Or well it should if you manage to usually read through most of my text.  It’s the same as the UI for the P26.  In fact these lights are essentially the same from the driver down.  The head differs, as does the emitter, but otherwise these lights are identical.


Mode Mode Claimed Output (lm) Claimed Runtime Mode Measured Lux Tailcap Amps
Turbo 1000 1h 20700 3.06
 Ultralow 0.5 500h ~0 ~0.0
Strobe 1000

LED and Beam

The MT22C uses a Cree XP-L HD.  The reflector is smooth, and shallow.  This makes a fairly artifacted beam with a hotspot showing the shape of the emitter fairly clearly.  The spill has a tint I don’t care for, too.  All in all it’s far from my favorite beam.


Just like the P26, the MT22C outthrows it’s rating by a substantial margin.  204m, when rated for 185.

These beamshots are always with the following settings: f8, ISO100, 0.3s shutter, and manual 5000K exposure.

Tint vs BLF-348


Random Comparisons and Competitive Options….

Here’s a relevantly filtered page on  There are many lights that compare to this one, except when the rotary dial is added to the criteria.  So the rotary must be considered the selling point.  I like the rotary, but it does need a touch of work.  I would absolutely love the two improvements mentioned and I think they’re doable.  Even in this current state, it’s a reasonable light.


What I like

  • Rotary switch works well
  • UI is very simple
  • Build quality is good

What I don’t like

  • Rotary switch needs improvement to work really well
  • Light is a bit long
  • Output is unregulated
  • No Low Voltage Protection


  • This light was provided by Nitecore for review. I was not paid to write this review.
  • This content originally appeared at  Please visit there for the best experience!
  • Whether or not I have a coupon for this light, I do have a bunch of coupons!!  Have a look at my spreadsheet for those coupons. It’s possible to subscribe and get notifications when the sheet is edited!!
Liked it? Take a second to support zeroair on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: