Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 Flashlight Review
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight features a high-output front emitter as well as a lantern-style rear-facing set of emitters, which also offer RGB. Read on!
Official Specs and Features
Here’s a link to the Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight product page.
Versions
There’s just one version of the Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight.
Price
List price for the Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight is right around $100, but it’s available right now at 40% off.
What’s Included
- Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight
- Wurkkos 32140 cell
- Lanyard
- Charging cable
- Spare o-rings
- Tripod
- Manual
Package and Manual
Build Quality and Disassembly
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight is a big ol’ light! That’s fine, as it has a bunch of features. The build quality is very good.
Both the head and tail have very thick springs.
The cell tube is fully removable, but it’s not reversible. I’m not even sure the threads are the same, but there’s a “blank gap” at both ends that is not the same length, that prevents reversing.
Size and Comps
217.5 mm x 60mm and 305g (without battery)
Here’s the light in hand:
Here’s the test light with the venerable Convoy S2+. The version below is a custom laser-engraved Convoy S2+ host by GadgetConnections.com. I did a full post on an engraved orange host right here! Or go straight to GadgetConnections.com to buy your Convoy S2+ now!
Also in the photo above, my Standard Reference Material (SRM) flashlight is the Hanko Machine Works Trident, an 18350 light. While I have not reviewed or tested the Gunner Grip version seen here, I have tested a Hanko Machine Works Trident Total Tesseract in brass. I love the Trident, and it’s a striking contrast to the inexpensive Convoy S2+, another great SRM.
Retention and Carry
A lanyard is included for the Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight. It’s a very simple wrist strap and attaches through a hole in the tailcap.
Also included separately from the light box itself is this tripod. I am not certain if this is an accessory purchase (I imagine it is). The tripod screws into a hole in the base.
If it’s extra, I wouldn’t pay much for it, but it’s pretty neat when used as a handle. It folds up reasonably small!
Power and Runtime
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight uses a 15000mah 32140 battery, which is, as the text implies, a LiFePO4 battery. This is different chemistry than we’re used to and has different characteristics.
But the cell still goes into the light in the same way most cells go into most light – positive end toward the head.
In case you forget that, you can check out this little printed icon on the (non-reversible) cell tube.
Below you can see a few runtimes for the front emitter and one for the rear emitters.
I don’t have a way to measure calibrated output for the lantern/reverse lights, so I just set the max to a relative 100, and you can see the profile from there.
The temperature lines in these charts are included as general context, not precise measurements. The values represent the range (min to max) during testing, but should not be taken as exact readings. A temperature sensor is not always attached to the bezel (or even the hottest spot, assuming that could be defined). Even with ideal placement, too many variables affect temperature to definitively state a specific max value.
Charging
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight has a USB-C charging port on the head.
Wurkkos includes a USB-A to USB-C charging cable.
Charging works fine from A to C and C to C, but if you have a PD source, the Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight will charge at 9V. That takes much less time than 5V (3h22m vs 4h11m).
Note that the terminal voltage for this LiFePO4 is not 4.2V; it’s around 3.5V.
Powerbank
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight USB-C port can be used as a powerbank (or “reverse charging”), and with the large-capacity LiFePO4 battery, it should provide a reasonable amount of emergency charge!
Modes and Currents
| Mode | Mode Claimed Output (lm) | Claimed Runtime | Measured Lumens | Tailcap Amps @ 3.5V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo – Front | 3200-1300 | 7m+3.67j | 3080 (0s) 2872 (30s) |
4.65 |
| Lowest – Front | 5 | 300h | – | 0.02 |
| Turbo – Side | 1100-750 | 15m+4.67h | – | 4.38 |
| Lowest – Side | 3 | 300h | – | 0.02 |
| – | 60h | – | – |
Pulse Width Modulation
In order below, these are spot twice, then flood twice. Flood is the only output that exhibits PWM.
Click here to see a “baseline” – a chart with almost no light hitting the sensor.
Then there’s the Ultrafire WF-602C flashlight, which has some of the worst PWM I’ve seen. It’s so bad that I used a post about it to explain PWM! Here are multiple timescales (10ms, 5ms, 2ms, 1ms, 0.5ms, 0.2ms) to make comparing this “worst” PWM light to the test light easier. That post also explains why I didn’t test the WF-602C at the usual 50us scale.
User Interface and Operation
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight has an e-switch for operation, but also a rotary selector around that e-switch. You select what output you want (front, rear white, rear RGB) and then the switch controls modes.
The user interface really offers a lot, except for discrete levels. 
The user interface is also fairly consistent between output types, which is appreciated. Note bottom right; there are a bunch of special modes, too.
LED and Beam
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight uses a Luminus SFT-70 emitter and a very smooth reflector.
The beam profile is very throwy.
The rear emitters are much more like a lantern. These offer variable CCT (“infinite” from warm white to cool white) and also RGB settings.
LED Color Report (CRI and CCT)
[in progress]
CCT (Correlated Color Temperature) refers to the measurement of the color appearance of light, expressed in Kelvins (K), which indicates whether the light is warm (yellowish) or cool (bluish). A lower CCT (below 3000K) is considered warm light, while a higher CCT (above 5000K) gives cooler, bluish light.
CRI (Color Rendering Index) is a measure of how accurately a light source renders colors in comparison to natural sunlight. Scored on a scale from 0 to 100, higher CRI values indicate that colors appear more true to life and vibrant, similar to how they would look under the sun.
Beamshots
These beamshots always have the following settings: f8, ISO100, 0.3s shutter, and manual 5000K exposure. These photos are taken at floor level, and the beam hits the ceiling around 9 feet away.
Tint vs BLF-348 (KillzoneFlashlights.com 219b version) (affiliate link)
I keep the test flashlight on the left and the BLF-348 reference flashlight on the right. These photos are taken around 18 inches from the door.
I compare everything to the KillzoneFlashlights.com 219b BLF-348 because it’s inexpensive and has the best tint!
Summary and Conclusion
The Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight is a neat light, for sure, and the unusual chemistry of the battery may have its own type of draw. The output from the front emitter is great (a bit under spec, but absolutely throwy). The lantern rear emitters are neat, too. I like the rotary output selector, but really wish there was more than just a ramping output option. I simply don’t love ramping enough for that. Anyway, the price is right, at around $60, for a light that doubles (triples? quadruples?) as a powerbank!
The Big Table
| Wurkkos TS27 LiFePO4 flashlight | |
|---|---|
| Emitter: | Luminus SFT70 |
| Price in USD at publication time: | $59.99 |
| Cell: | 1×32140 |
| Runtime Graphs | |
| LVP? | Yes |
| Switch Type: | E-switch |
| Quiescent Current (mA): | ? |
| On-Board Charging? | Yes |
| Charge Port Type: | USB-C |
| Charge Graph | |
| Power off Charge Port | |
| Claimed Lumens (lm) | 3200 |
| Measured Lumens (at 30s) | 2872 (89.8% of claim)^ |
| Candela per Lumen | 57.1 |
| Claimed Throw (m) | 845 |
| Candela (Calculated) in cd (at 30s) | 5490lux @ 6.021m = 199026cd |
| Throw (Calculated) (m) | 892.2 (105.6% of claim)^ |
| Item provided for review by: | Wurkkos |
| All my Wurkkos reviews! | |
^ Measurement disclaimer: Testing flashlights is my hobby. I use hobbyist-level equipment for testing, including some I made myself. Try not to get buried in the details of manufacturer specifications versus measurements recorded here; A certain amount of difference (say, 10 or 15%) is perfectly reasonable.
What I like
- Throwy beam
- Reasonable cost
- Unusual cell chemistry (has properties you may be interested in)
- Rotary selector
What I don’t like
- Ramping only
- Cool white front emitter
Notes
- This content originally appeared at zeroair.org. Please visit there for the best experience!
- Please use my Amazon.com referral link to help support zeroair.org!
- Please support me on Patreon! I deeply appreciate your support!



















































